ladies n gentleman it was an honor living in a country known as India

167°
Top Comments
Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
androgame wrote:

I understand that bhai, was just mentioning that even such higher reservations won't make any difference since the population demographics for Chattisgarh are different from the national average. 

Otherwise 76% sounds ridiculous , but with context, its digestible. 

The thing is, today it is Chhattisgarh but tomorrow it will be some other state because if this law holds true in Chhattisgarh then it will logically hold true in any other state. In this country where elections are won by a 25-30% segment of population voting for a particular party this is a disaster in making if not stopped by Supreme Court.
Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
androgame wrote:

Bhai Chattisgarh has a significant population of reserved categories, so this increase is immaterial

Frankly I was shocked at the headline since I missed reading Chattisgarh. Thoughts of moving out of India had started crawling toungueout

It is about principle of equality, just because a community is 60% of population doesn't mean it should get 60% seats in every organization because by that logic Parsis & Jains wouldn't get anything but they are currently the most successful communities in India both in terms of financial as well as social achievements.

20 Comments  |  
7 Dimers
  • Sort By
Benevolent Benevolent
Link Copied

😞Man 

Blogger Blogger
Link Copied

in the last para it says..

"BJP members did not take part in the discussion on the resolution and staged a walkout"

Except BJP every party wants reservations... person from OC is will be useless in future.

Pro Community Angel Pro Community Angel
Link Copied
Ash-D wrote:

😞Man 

Bhai Chattisgarh has a significant population of reserved categories, so this increase is immaterial

Frankly I was shocked at the headline since I missed reading Chattisgarh. Thoughts of moving out of India had started crawling toungueout

Critic Critic
Link Copied
hese wrote:

in the last para it says..

"BJP members did not take part in the discussion on the resolution and staged a walkout"

Except BJP every party wants reservations... person from OC is will be useless in future.

BJP also wants reservation as long as it is for general category(aka EWS reservation).
Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
androgame wrote:

Bhai Chattisgarh has a significant population of reserved categories, so this increase is immaterial

Frankly I was shocked at the headline since I missed reading Chattisgarh. Thoughts of moving out of India had started crawling toungueout

It is about principle of equality, just because a community is 60% of population doesn't mean it should get 60% seats in every organization because by that logic Parsis & Jains wouldn't get anything but they are currently the most successful communities in India both in terms of financial as well as social achievements.

Pro Community Angel Pro Community Angel
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:

It is about principle of equality, just because a community is 60% of population doesn't mean it should get 60% seats in every organization because by that logic Parsis & Jains wouldn't get anything but they are currently the most successful communities in India both in terms of financial as well as social achievements.

I understand that bhai, was just mentioning that even such higher reservations won't make any difference since the population demographics for Chattisgarh are different from the national average. 

Otherwise 76% sounds ridiculous on the national basis, but with context, its digestible. 

Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
androgame wrote:

I understand that bhai, was just mentioning that even such higher reservations won't make any difference since the population demographics for Chattisgarh are different from the national average. 

Otherwise 76% sounds ridiculous , but with context, its digestible. 

The thing is, today it is Chhattisgarh but tomorrow it will be some other state because if this law holds true in Chhattisgarh then it will logically hold true in any other state. In this country where elections are won by a 25-30% segment of population voting for a particular party this is a disaster in making if not stopped by Supreme Court.
Pro Community Angel Pro Community Angel
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:
The thing is, today it is Chhattisgarh but tomorrow it will be some other state because if this law holds true in Chhattisgarh then it will logically hold true in any other state. In this country where elections are won by a 25-30% segment of population voting for a particular party this is a disaster in making if not stopped by Supreme Court.

Not sure, but don't think this would pass even the high court (based on past such instances) 

Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
androgame wrote:

Not sure, but don't think this would pass even the high court (based on past such instances) 

Supreme Court already started on wrong foot by rejecting TN govt plea to declare EWS reservation as constitutionally invalid as it includes only poor of general category while excluding poor from reserved categories. This decision was given by a 5 judge bench with 3-2 majority so obviously even among Supreme Court there is quite a division over this matter.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-na...

Benevolent Benevolent
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:
The thing is, today it is Chhattisgarh but tomorrow it will be some other state because if this law holds true in Chhattisgarh then it will logically hold true in any other state. In this country where elections are won by a 25-30% segment of population voting for a particular party this is a disaster in making if not stopped by Supreme Court.
paji heard in haryana n punjab 48% reservation is for one specific class.not able to find link for it
Benevolent Benevolent
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:

Supreme Court already started on wrong foot by rejecting TN govt plea to declare EWS reservation as constitutionally invalid as it includes only poor of general category while excluding poor from reserved categories. This decision was given by a 5 judge bench with 3-2 majority so obviously even among Supreme Court there is quite a division over this matter.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-na...

This decision was given by a 5 judge bench with 3-2 majority so
obviously even among Supreme Court there is quite a division over this
matter.

any quota there paji?
Pro Community Angel Pro Community Angel
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:

Supreme Court already started on wrong foot by rejecting TN govt plea to declare EWS reservation as constitutionally invalid as it includes only poor of general category while excluding poor from reserved categories. This decision was given by a 5 judge bench with 3-2 majority so obviously even among Supreme Court there is quite a division over this matter.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-na...

But the case for caste based reservation is quite clear I think, in the past high courts have held that 50% ceiling, let's see in this case. Most probably would be struck down 


Benevolent Benevolent
Link Copied
Expand
androgame wrote:

But the case for caste based reservation is quite clear I think, in the past high courts have held that 50% ceiling, let's see in this case. Most probably would be struck down 


Most probably would be struck down

the politicians will then amend the laws
Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
kukdookoo wrote:
This decision was given by a 5 judge bench with 3-2 majority so
obviously even among Supreme Court there is quite a division over this
matter.

any quota there paji?
In higher judiciary & armed forces there is no quota.
Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
kukdookoo wrote:
paji heard in haryana n punjab 48% reservation is for one specific class.not able to find link for it
Highly unlikely, maybe confusing with very specific vacancies or some one time scenario.
Benevolent Benevolent
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:
In higher judiciary & armed forces there is no quota.
Aap point nahi samje. Some of those judges came from a quota.
Benevolent Benevolent
Link Copied
Expand
guest_999 wrote:
Highly unlikely, maybe confusing with very specific vacancies or some one time scenario.
No certain about it. Will share link when I find it.
Critic Critic
Link Copied
Expand
kukdookoo wrote:
Aap point nahi samje. Some of those judges came from a quota.
If you are talking about nepotism in collegium system then that's different, I am talking about "official quota" given by a law made by the govt based on constitution/constitutional amendment.
Deal Captain Deal Captain
Link Copied

Yes, please, those who are against Reservations for the Oppressed castes should move out of this country. Bye bye. 💃

Deal Cadet Deal Cadet
Link Copied
Jairaj wrote:

Yes, please, those who are against Reservations for the Oppressed castes should move out of this country. Bye bye. 💃

So how many were oppressed? Are those oppressed like in mother india film still alive??

Are all obc and st treated badly in all states and regions? Are all general candidates of today or their parents, grandparents have blood on their hands?

Even other countries like Japan has atrocious caste system and they removed it and gave a head start on improvement for the first 10-15 years whereas in India, it's 75+ years and still begging for reservations in colleges to jobs. This is why India will never be developed.

replyuser
Click here to reply
Reply