Married Women Allowed 500 Gram Gold, Unmarried ...

Married Women Allowed 500 Gram Gold, Unmarried Women 250 Gram, Clarifies Government! Clean Discussion Only.

Vote up smileyx5
Score: 5 Votes: 5
Images
Moderator
4
267
14448
227

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-tax-on-ancest...

Married Women Allowed 500 Gram Gold, Unmarried Women 250 Gram, Clarifies Government!!


Have been discussing this topic offline too much since few days!

What do you think? How much gold is legitimate to have?

16 Comments  |  
11 Dimers
Giphy
Deal Captain
18
12
10704
133

Only the normal people will ultimately be harassed by this rule. The real rich & sourceful will bribe the officials upto their mouth.
https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_biggrin.gif

Images%282%29
Deal Lieutenant
0
212
4316
31

Wht about men?

Edit: 100gm, not pacchas tola. Whether married or not https://cdn3.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_lol.gif

Govt says Men will be Men. https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_toungueout.gif

Giphy
Deal Captain
18
12
10704
133
mr.lonely wrote:

Wht aboutmen?

100gm

Images
Moderator
4
267
14448
227
mr.lonely wrote:

Wht aboutmen?

100 GM is too less.

Please Note 100GM for Male Person is for those who are not paying Tax!

If you are paying Tax every year For ex: 1 Lakh, 2 Lakh, 3 Lakh….and so on.
Then you can have relative Gold with you.

Missing
suspended
0
201
188
4
hese wrote:

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-tax-on-ancest...

Married Women Allowed 500 Gram Gold, Unmarried Women 250 Gram, Clarifies Government!!

—————————————

Have been discussing this topic offline too much since few days!


What do you think? How much gold is legitimate to have?

and with that
new confusion and more back and forth changes to these absurd daily soap

Many courts, including the highest court in India has granted legal status to “live-in” jeans relatiinships
Those women don’t get to keep 500?

@nd what of “stree dhan”? (wherever applicable, depending on community or releguon and corresponding law)

lastly, inheritance and gifts (subject to wealrh tsx @nd all) have differnt porvizon so then now?

Missing
suspended
0
201
188
4
Expand
hese wrote:

100 GM is too less.


Please Note 100GM for Male Person is for those who are not paying Tax!

If you are paying Tax every year For ex: 1 Lakh, 2 Lakh, 3 Lakh….and so on.
Then you can have relative Gold with you.

@ny relative’s gold?

Barfi Lehari is my relative
https://cdn0.desidime.com/attachments/photos/148597/medium/bappi_lahiri.jpg?1480614183
thumbs up if rules alliw me to keep half his

Missing
Deal Subedar
2
154
2032
16

these are not new rules. have been in existence since 1994. only reiterated.
also, does not apply to digital gold (ETF/Gold bonds)

Missing
Deal Cadet
0
65
107
2

U can have all the gold in the world, no limit if bought from tax paid money, inherited, heirloom. Todays news is misleading as most tv wala r a big arse hole. The 500gm etc rule is ther since 20+ yrs & addresses only search & seizure part. Even if u have 1 gm gold or anything bought from undisclosed untaxed income u r in trouble, forget 500gms

Missing
Deal Cadet
0
65
107
2

500gm etc limit means if during IT raid u r caught with less than 500gm then it wont be seized & kept wid IT till case is decided. It doesnt mean that u cant hold more than 500gms.

Missing
suspended
0
201
188
4
panchabhut wrote:

these are not new rules. have been in existence since 1994. only reiterated.
also, does not apply to digital gold (ETF/Gold bonds)

+1

but like everything else
and everywhere else
selective enforcement
or a show of it can help get footage

Swamivivekananda1
Deal Lieutenant
6
210
3385
42

dont be confused guys .
1. this is old same rule from 1994 which is clarified today to stop rumors saying that govt will seize lockers/gold etc.
2. you can corss check do google this – " instruction no. 1916 (f.no. 286/63/93-it(inv.ii), dated 11-5-1994 "
3. 500gm limit and other aforesaid lmits are only which you can keep it even if you are not assessed to wealth tax .

Read This -

part of CBDT circular 1916 dated 11-5-1994 .

"""
5. For better appreciation of the issue involved in these cases, it would be appropriate to refer to the Board Instruction No.1916 [F.No.286/63/93-IT (INV.II)], dated 11.5.1994, which reads as under:
“Instruction No.1916 [F.No.286/63/93-IT (INV.II)]
Guidelines for seizure of jewellery and ornaments in course of search 11.5.1994
SEARCH & SEIZURE
SECTIONS 132,
Instances of seizure of jewellery of small quantity in course of operations under s.132 have come to the notice of the Board. The question of a common approach to situations where search parties come across items of jewellery, has been examined by the Board and following guidelines are issued for strict compliance—
(i) In the case of a wealth-tax assessee, gold jewellery and ornaments found in excess of the gross weight declared in the wealth-tax return only need be seized.
(ii) In the case of a person not assessed to wealth-tax, gold jewellery and ornaments to the extent of 500 gms per married lady, 250 gms per unmarried lady and 100 gms per male member of the family, need not be seized.
(iii) The authorised officer may, having regard to the status of the family and the custom and practices of the community to which the family belongs and other circumstances of the case, decide to exclude a larger quantity of jewellery and ornaments from seizure. This should be reported to the Director of Income-Tax/Commissioner authorising the search at the time of furnishing the search report.
(iv) In all cases, a detailed inventory of the jewellery and ornaments found must be prepared to be used for assessment purposes.”
"""

PS – in short , understand simple thing that whatever you have whether in millions or billions if that thing is bought/earned from legal way and paid taxes then no can touch you , that’s all .

Img 20170303 wa0005
Deal Captain
7
196
7420
38

I assume what will happen with Bappy Lahri now https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_rolleyes.gif

Missing
Deal Lieutenant
2
336
5196
59
AmitGoyal350 wrote:

I assume what will happen with Bappy Lahri now https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_rolleyes.gif

He will sing… https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_biggrin.gif
.
Yaad aa raha hai mera pyar…. https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_toungueout.gif

B4e8bef6 672f 4289 873c ec8c9357627d edited
Critic
4
1
4054
82

https://i.imgur.com/Iy1gMhW.jpg

Images
Moderator
4
267
14448
227
panchabhut wrote:

these are not new rules. have been in existence since 1994. only reiterated.
also, does not apply to digital gold (ETF/Gold bonds)

Didn’t know this!
How could i miss https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor/icon_eek.gif Thanks any how!

Missing