Supreme Court may ban Whatsapp in India

Hike use karenge

Yeh dono →
1) @Spock
2) @Tejaa
will be happy that people will not ask for their whatsapp then

@Patel wrote:

Hike use karenge

Hike is also in this list .

@DealLooter0015 wrote:

@Patel wrote:

Hike use karenge

Hike is also in this list .

DesiDime ka Chat use karenge

@Patel wrote:

@DealLooter0015 wrote:

@Patel wrote:

Hike use karenge

Hike is also in this list .

DesiDime ka Chat use karenge

@Patel wrote:

@DealLooter0015 wrote:

@Patel wrote:

Hike use karenge

Hike is also in this list .

DesiDime ka Chat use karenge

WOW… Vu..
Finally.., Will Get Some Relief(Life)

Mera MSG Dekh Ke Bhi Reply Nai Kiye … Jhoot Mat Bolo Blue Tick Tha

Kab Se Online Ho Kiss Se Baat Kar Rahe The ?

Mujhe To 2 AM Gn Bol Diya Tha 02:05 AM Ka Last Seen Kyu Tha … Haan Haan Ab To Last Seen Band Kar He Doge

Ye Status Mere Liye Hain Na

i AM EXCITED, KAR DO BAN WHATSAPP KO WE have Indian Messaging App alternatives

would be happy if something like this happen ?
this way all looters would be forced to move back to desu dime and we will get lotttttttttttts of loots and tricks and pes
Yeah!!!!!!!!

It’s hilarious how one segment cries over protection of their privacy and the other(or the very same hypocrites) spread concern over ‘too’ tight security on their apps where they share their personal details. Ask this guy what happens when there is no encryption and the data is served on the plate to be hacked and distributed(already softwares exit and freely available for reading the watsapp backup files) or when mass hysteria strikes over concerns government sneaking into people’s personal lives. Remember the JLaw scandal? Her extremely private pics were hacked and distributed online when a hacker found a weakness in security.

@DealLooter0015 wrote:

@Patel wrote:

@DealLooter0015 wrote:

@Patel wrote:

Hike use karenge

Hike is also in this list .

DesiDime ka Chat use karenge

Haha Finally we are Dimers , koi nahi hara sakta hame …LOL

Bring Back The Old Days

let it ban, atleast for a few days…!!
and make those always engaged people realize that there is a world around…

"@katsumoto100":http://www.desidime.com/users/6259 wrote:

let it ban, atleast for a few days…!!
and make those always engaged people realize that there is a world around…

I’m not using it, so I don’t care

yyar is bnde ko zabardst dikkatt h wa se
lgta h iski bndi ne ise dhokha diya h

thrifty sir Thrifty Saar Thrifty Sir,
for the moment if we can isolate the principal point from the set-up (who is doing it or why is it being done)

are you or are you not in favour of .. or are you sitting on the fence ? when it comes to security apparatus having the means to monitor ?
[again, i request you to isolate the set-up. lets for the moment forget that we are talking of the [QUOTE]Indian[/UNQUOTE] security agencies. who it would not be surprising if they turn a deaf hear to even an anti-national or anti-social coming and sitting on their lap and screaming i am a miscreant.]

so forget that it is India or xyz filed so and so plea citing such and such reason.

Principally, are you okay to a Black Behari Messenger or a notsapp messenger or any mode of communication be this secure that it can not be monitored into by any agency even in an unforeseen event ?

@thrifty_indian wrote: It’s hilarious how one segment cries over protection of their privacy and the other(or the very same hypocrites) spread concern over ‘too’ tight security on their apps where they share their personal details. Ask this guy what happens when there is no encryption and the data is served on the plate to be hacked and distributed(already softwares exit and freely available for reading the watsapp backup files) or when mass hysteria strikes over concerns government sneaking into people’s personal lives. Remember the JLaw scandal? Her extremely private pics were hacked and distributed online when a hacker found a weakness in security.

not to be pro or against all this mess Thrifty, but seriously brother

if it comes to saving pictures of your well toned body or close-ups of your genitals or bodily secretions
versus
letting the larger public have that itsy-bitsy chance of getting saved from havoc..

then i’d choose the latter.

no offence [if you DO take it, then kindly replace your with name of that 25 years old dame born on 15^th Aug 1990].

#Privacy_Is_A_Myth

Indian judicial system will take 10 years to decide.

Sometimes I feel like you are a bot after reading your replies. Half of the things you write goea above my head. Take it lightly 💡
No offence .

@Spock wrote:

thrifty sir Thrifty Saar Thrifty Sir,
for the moment if we can isolate the principal point from the set-up (who is doing it or why is it being done)

are you or are you not in favour of .. or are you sitting on the fence ? when it comes to security apparatus having the means to monitor ?
[again, i request you to isolate the set-up. lets for the moment forget that we are talking of the [QUOTE]Indian[/UNQUOTE] security agencies. who it would not be surprising if they turn a deaf hear to even an anti-national or anti-social coming and sitting on their lap and screaming i am a miscreant.]

so forget that it is India or xyz filed so and so plea citing such and such reason.

Principally, are you okay to a Black Behari Messenger or a notsapp messenger or any mode of communication be this secure that it can not be monitored into by any agency even in an unforeseen event ?

@thrifty_indian wrote: It’s hilarious how one segment cries over protection of their privacy and the other(or the very same hypocrites) spread concern over ‘too’ tight security on their apps where they share their personal details. Ask this guy what happens when there is no encryption and the data is served on the plate to be hacked and distributed(already softwares exit and freely available for reading the watsapp backup files) or when mass hysteria strikes over concerns government sneaking into people’s personal lives. Remember the JLaw scandal? Her extremely private pics were hacked and distributed online when a hacker found a weakness in security.

not to be pro or against all this mess Thrifty, but seriously brother

if it comes to saving pictures of your well toned body or close-ups of your genitals or bodily secretions
versus
letting the larger public have that itsy-bitsy chance of getting saved from havoc..

then i’d choose the latter.

no offence [if you DO take it, then kindly replace your with name of that 25 years old dame born on 15^th Aug 1990].

#Privacy_Is_A_Myth

@vinaythewanted wrote:

Sometimes I feel like you are a bot after reading your replies. Half of the things you write goea above my head. Take it lightly 💡
No offence .

@Spock wrote:

thrifty sir Thrifty Saar Thrifty Sir,
for the moment if we can isolate the principal point from the set-up (who is doing it or why is it being done)

are you or are you not in favour of .. or are you sitting on the fence ? when it comes to security apparatus having the means to monitor ?
[again, i request you to isolate the set-up. lets for the moment forget that we are talking of the [QUOTE]Indian[/UNQUOTE] security agencies. who it would not be surprising if they turn a deaf hear to even an anti-national or anti-social coming and sitting on their lap and screaming i am a miscreant.]

so forget that it is India or xyz filed so and so plea citing such and such reason.

Principally, are you okay to a Black Behari Messenger or a notsapp messenger or any mode of communication be this secure that it can not be monitored into by any agency even in an unforeseen event ?

@thrifty_indian wrote: It’s hilarious how one segment cries over protection of their privacy and the other(or the very same hypocrites) spread concern over ‘too’ tight security on their apps where they share their personal details. Ask this guy what happens when there is no encryption and the data is served on the plate to be hacked and distributed(already softwares exit and freely available for reading the watsapp backup files) or when mass hysteria strikes over concerns government sneaking into people’s personal lives. Remember the JLaw scandal? Her extremely private pics were hacked and distributed online when a hacker found a weakness in security.

not to be pro or against all this mess Thrifty, but seriously brother

if it comes to saving pictures of your well toned body or close-ups of your genitals or bodily secretions
versus
letting the larger public have that itsy-bitsy chance of getting saved from havoc..

then i’d choose the latter.

no offence [if you DO take it, then kindly replace your with name of that 25 years old dame born on 15^th Aug 1990].

#Privacy_Is_A_Myth

Same here

@Spock
I don’t agree with your views:
1. If I take a shit and admire my creation and decide to take a picture of it to capture the moment for future reference. It’s none of anyone else business. It’s MY shit and MY picture.
2. Quoting you “if it comes to saving pictures of your well toned body or close-ups of your genitals or bodily secretions
versus
letting the larger public have that itsy-bitsy chance of getting saved from havoc..”

What ‘havoc’ are you really talking about? Does Indian agencies really have the tech to monitor every single Indian’s watsapp? And do they really that proactive? After a bomb blast or terrorist attack they claim there ‘had’ been a intelligence report(and they ate samosas on that paper)
3. If they want the key to the encryption then who has stopped them from acquiring it? Have they asked watsapp? This petitioner was more concerned than CBI? I am really confused whether to praise this guy or laugh at CBI’s incompetence.
4. An app or service should and must have good security for it’s data and channels. If gov wants to snoop in then they can ask the company for the key its fine but it’s not fine for letting your pervert colleague take a looksie in your private matters.

@thrifty_indian wrote: 1. If I take a <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">shit and admire my creation and decide to take a picture of it to capture the moment for future reference. It’s none of anyone else business. It’s MY shit <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">and MY picture.<a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>">

@👍👍👍 sharing is caring! we don’t mind if you NSFH NSFW http://www.ratemypoo.com/besto...ml @👍👍👍

@thrifty_indian wrote: What ‘havoc’ are you really talking about? Does Indian agencies really have the tech to monitor every single Indian’s watsapp? And do they really that proactive? After a bomb blast or terrorist attack they claim there ‘had’ been a intelligence report(and they ate samosas on that paper)

I agree Thrifty, that things are not right. but like you said in the beginning, what JLaw (her pics) or what you do in your private life are ‘private’.. similarly it is in the nature of work and need of the security apparatus to do everything it can to ‘serve and protect’.

For this there might be need to blur the privacy lines

and to hand it to whatsapp. it is toeing the line on most of the Sovereign demands demands they get http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/37969/digit... they do or did share things and entertain requests.

3. If they want the key to the encryption then who has stopped them from acquiring it? Have they asked watsapp? This petitioner was more concerned than CBI? I am really confused whether to praise this guy or laugh at CBI’s incompetence.
4. An app or service should and must have good security for it’s data and channels. If gov wants to snoop in then they can ask the company for the key its fine but it’s not fine for letting your pervert colleague take a looksie in your private matters.

i do not know the merits of the case Thrifty, to confess the reality.
and yet I also say this: that it is okay for courts (judges) to sometimes take suo-motu petitions (sometimes, merely based on unclear reports) or for people to take up a cause that otherwise has not been taken up or even highlighted.

I completely agree that the access to certain user’s data or even real time monitoring of the servers that pass these information could and should be pressed upon by authorities themselves too.
in the case of Blackberry, I think they had to host a server in our jurisdiction ultimately and get by with the Canadian alibi.

i have no personal stake in this silly app furore as I do not even use it, but i do think that if you know that I am an anti social or even a trouble-maker, then in that case if someone needs to check in into my activities, there ought to be a reasonable way to do so.

of-course, no one wants pervert colleague or neighbour or relative to have access to others private conversation. I do not see how that is related to this present issue of giving the agencies a way to look into problematic or suspected problematic accounts.

@Spock wrote:

@thrifty_indian wrote: 1. If I take a <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">shit and admire my creation and decide to take a picture of it to capture the moment for future reference. It’s none of anyone else business. It’s MY shit <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">and MY picture.<a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>">

@👍👍👍 sharing is caring! we don’t mind if you NSFH NSFW http://www.ratemypoo.com/besto...ml @👍👍👍

@thrifty_indian wrote: What ‘havoc’ are you really talking about? Does Indian agencies really have the tech to monitor every single Indian’s watsapp? And do they really that proactive? After a bomb blast or terrorist attack they claim there ‘had’ been a intelligence report(and they ate samosas on that paper)

I agree Thrifty, that things are not right. but like you said in the beginning, what JLaw (her pics) or what you do in your private life are ‘private’.. similarly it is in the nature of work and need of the security apparatus to do everything it can to ‘serve and protect’.

For this there might be need to blur the privacy lines

and to hand it to whatsapp. it is toeing the line on most of the Sovereign demands demands they get http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/37969/digit... they do or did share things and entertain requests.

---

---

Dada, I think i may not have got across and need to re-emphasise here:
that i request you to de-link with our desi situation nee desi-thulla, mama, police.. umm okay, what i meant is, say if you are in Sweden or a Norwegian national (low crime rates and efficient law enforcement .. i mean look up Sollentuna Prison )
would then it be okay for security forces to get need based access ?

3. If they want the key to the encryption then who has stopped them from acquiring it? Have they asked watsapp? This petitioner was more concerned than CBI? I am really confused whether to praise this guy or laugh at CBI’s incompetence.
4. An app or service should and must have good security for it’s data and channels. If gov wants to snoop in then they can ask the company for the key its fine but it’s not fine for letting your pervert colleague take a looksie in your private matters.

i do not know the merits of the case Thrifty, to confess the reality.
and yet I also say this: that it is okay for courts (judges) to sometimes take suo-motu petitions (sometimes, merely based on unclear reports) or for people to take up a cause that otherwise has not been taken up or even highlighted.

I completely agree that the access to certain user’s data or even real time monitoring of the servers that pass these information could and should be pressed upon by authorities themselves too.
in the case of Blackberry, I think they had to host a server in our jurisdiction ultimately and get by with the Canadian alibi.

i have no personal stake in this silly app furore as I do not even use it, but i do think that if you know that I am an anti social or even a trouble-maker, then in that case if someone needs to check in into my activities, there ought to be a reasonable way to do so.

of-course, no one wants pervert colleague or neighbour or relative to have access to others private conversation. I do not see how that is related to this present issue of giving the agencies a way to look into problematic or suspected problematic accounts.

Har topic pe Essay kaisey likh lete ho aap? Bataao naa.. Mere ko Tuition chahiye!

@thrifty_indian Bhai, mujhe bhi Samosa khana hai

@Plato wrote:

Yeh dono →
1) @Spock
2) @Tejaa
will be happy that people will not ask for their whatsapp then

Add @DealSeeker and
@asoka too.

@Plato wrote:

@Spock wrote:

@thrifty_indian wrote: 1. If I take a <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">shit and admire my creation and decide to take a picture of it to capture the moment for future reference. It’s none of anyone else business. It’s MY shit <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">and MY picture.<a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>">

@👍👍👍 sharing is caring! we don’t mind if you NSFH NSFW http://www.ratemypoo.com/besto...ml @👍👍👍

@thrifty_indian wrote: What ‘havoc’ are you really talking about? Does Indian agencies really have the tech to monitor every single Indian’s watsapp? And do they really that proactive? After a bomb blast or terrorist attack they claim there ‘had’ been a intelligence report(and they ate samosas on that paper)

I agree Thrifty, that things are not right. but like you said in the beginning, what JLaw (her pics) or what you do in your private life are ‘private’.. similarly it is in the nature of work and need of the security apparatus to do everything it can to ‘serve and protect’.

For this there might be need to blur the privacy lines

and to hand it to whatsapp. it is toeing the line on most of the Sovereign demands demands they get http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/37969/digit... they do or did share things and entertain requests.

---

---

Dada, I think i may not have got across and need to re-emphasise here:
that i request you to de-link with our desi situation nee desi-thulla, mama, police.. umm okay, what i meant is, say if you are in Sweden or a Norwegian national (low crime rates and efficient law enforcement .. i mean look up Sollentuna Prison )
would then it be okay for security forces to get need based access ?

3. If they want the key to the encryption then who has stopped them from acquiring it? Have they asked watsapp? This petitioner was more concerned than CBI? I am really confused whether to praise this guy or laugh at CBI’s incompetence.
4. An app or service should and must have good security for it’s data and channels. If gov wants to snoop in then they can ask the company for the key its fine but it’s not fine for letting your pervert colleague take a looksie in your private matters.

i do not know the merits of the case Thrifty, to confess the reality.
and yet I also say this: that it is okay for courts (judges) to sometimes take suo-motu petitions (sometimes, merely based on unclear reports) or for people to take up a cause that otherwise has not been taken up or even highlighted.

I completely agree that the access to certain user’s data or even real time monitoring of the servers that pass these information could and should be pressed upon by authorities themselves too.
in the case of Blackberry, I think they had to host a server in our jurisdiction ultimately and get by with the Canadian alibi.

i have no personal stake in this silly app furore as I do not even use it, but i do think that if you know that I am an anti social or even a trouble-maker, then in that case if someone needs to check in into my activities, there ought to be a reasonable way to do so.

of-course, no one wants pervert colleague or neighbour or relative to have access to others private conversation. I do not see how that is related to this present issue of giving the agencies a way to look into problematic or suspected problematic accounts.

Har topic pe Essay kaisey likh lete ho aap? Bataao naa.. Mere ko Tuition chahiye!

@thrifty_indian Bhai, mujhe bhi Samosa khana hai

Konsa? <img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">

@thrifty_indian wrote:

@Plato wrote:

@Spock wrote:

@thrifty_indian wrote: 1. If I take a <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">shit and admire my creation and decide to take a picture of it to capture the moment for future reference. It’s none of anyone else business. It’s MY shit <a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">and MY picture.<a href=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>"><img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn1.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“love” border=“0”/>">

@👍👍👍 sharing is caring! we don’t mind if you NSFH NSFW http://www.ratemypoo.com/besto...ml @👍👍👍

@thrifty_indian wrote: What ‘havoc’ are you really talking about? Does Indian agencies really have the tech to monitor every single Indian’s watsapp? And do they really that proactive? After a bomb blast or terrorist attack they claim there ‘had’ been a intelligence report(and they ate samosas on that paper)

I agree Thrifty, that things are not right. but like you said in the beginning, what JLaw (her pics) or what you do in your private life are ‘private’.. similarly it is in the nature of work and need of the security apparatus to do everything it can to ‘serve and protect’.

For this there might be need to blur the privacy lines

and to hand it to whatsapp. it is toeing the line on most of the Sovereign demands demands they get http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/37969/digit... they do or did share things and entertain requests.

---

---

Dada, I think i may not have got across and need to re-emphasise here:
that i request you to de-link with our desi situation nee desi-thulla, mama, police.. umm okay, what i meant is, say if you are in Sweden or a Norwegian national (low crime rates and efficient law enforcement .. i mean look up Sollentuna Prison )
would then it be okay for security forces to get need based access ?

3. If they want the key to the encryption then who has stopped them from acquiring it? Have they asked watsapp? This petitioner was more concerned than CBI? I am really confused whether to praise this guy or laugh at CBI’s incompetence.
4. An app or service should and must have good security for it’s data and channels. If gov wants to snoop in then they can ask the company for the key its fine but it’s not fine for letting your pervert colleague take a looksie in your private matters.

i do not know the merits of the case Thrifty, to confess the reality.
and yet I also say this: that it is okay for courts (judges) to sometimes take suo-motu petitions (sometimes, merely based on unclear reports) or for people to take up a cause that otherwise has not been taken up or even highlighted.

I completely agree that the access to certain user’s data or even real time monitoring of the servers that pass these information could and should be pressed upon by authorities themselves too.
in the case of Blackberry, I think they had to host a server in our jurisdiction ultimately and get by with the Canadian alibi.

i have no personal stake in this silly app furore as I do not even use it, but i do think that if you know that I am an anti social or even a trouble-maker, then in that case if someone needs to check in into my activities, there ought to be a reasonable way to do so.

of-course, no one wants pervert colleague or neighbour or relative to have access to others private conversation. I do not see how that is related to this present issue of giving the agencies a way to look into problematic or suspected problematic accounts.

Har topic pe Essay kaisey likh lete ho aap? Bataao naa.. Mere ko Tuition chahiye!

@thrifty_indian Bhai, mujhe bhi Samosa khana hai

Konsa? <img src=“http://cdn1.desidi...om ”https://cdn2.desidime.com/assets/textile-editor..." alt=“poo” border=“0”/>">

Yeh Maganlal ka Choco Fudge hai kya? Thank you, mujhe meetha khana manaa hai.

don’t worry guys, baba ramdev will comes with patanjali Whatsapp.