Unfortunately this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Desidime Premier League 2016 - Semi Final
- 7268
- 200
-
- Last Comment
Congratulations to all four teams for reaching the semi finals
Team Invincible vs Team Ironman (1100 Hrs)
DD22 vs Virtual Warriors (1500 Hrs)
Both the Games will be on played on 22nd June 2016 (tomorrow)
Below are the type of contest which will be played in semi-final match. Total time per match will be 1 hour and 45 minutes.
1. Strategy [30 minutes]
2. Rapid fire (total 3 games) [45 minutes]
3. Never buy if you are a dimer (one chance only) [30 minutes]
Admin team will create a new thread for all the games, and both the teams has to post their entries in that one thread only.
Minimum 2 players has to take part in the match. And one player cant play one contest/game continuously.
For Example:- If Player A is playing contest 1 (strategy), then he cant play game 1 under contest 2 (Rapid fire), but he can play game 2.
Rules for the match is as follows.
Strategy
Rules for match
- Admin team will announce one product category in the main contest thread, each team has to select five stores withing 5 minutes, after which the Admin will release the product.
- Each team will get 25 minutes to find the cheapest product from only the 5 stores which the team has selected. Time starts as soon as the product is posted.
- Editing your thread or posts is not allowed. If you find a better deal/coupon, please comment in your contest thread as a fresh post.
- Links/Sites where the product is out of stock will not be considered as an valid entry.
- The product has to be from an Indian site (international sites shipping products to India wont be considered).
- Coupons can be applied, but these coupons can not be one time coupon codes of other coupon/affiliate sites, cant be bank specific coupon codes, Signup/registration coupons will be allowed.
- Entries containing final price after cashback will not be considered valid
- Product link and price must be correct and it should be in the same post. (Round off figure will not be considered) if price is Rs 4.56 Then mentioning Rs 5 is not valid)
- If the deal is from eBay, seller rating less than 50 will not be allowed (unless it is promoted by eBay itself).
- Deals/Coupons from sites which are banned on DesiDime won’t be allowed in the contest.
- Each team will get 30 minutes to find the product.
- If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty
- Other Terms & Conditions will be notified simultaneously with the products.
- In case of any dispute, admin team will take the final decision.
Rapid Fire
Rules for match
- Admin team will announce 3 products in the main contest thread, one by one at the interval of 15 minutes.
- Each team will get 15 minutes/game (total 45 minutes) to find the cheapest product.Time starts as soon as the product is posted.
- Entries for game 1 will not be considered valid once 15 minutes are over and/or the product for game 2 is released,which ever comes earlier. Same will be the the case for game 2 and 3.
- Editing your thread or posts is not allowed. If you find a better deal/coupon, please comment in your contest thread as a fresh post.
- Links/Sites where the product is out of stock will not be considered as an valid entry.
- The product has to be from an Indian site (international sites shipping products to India wont be considered).
- Coupons can be applied, but these coupons can not be one time coupon codes of other coupon/affiliate sites, cant be bank specific coupon codes, Signup/registration coupons will be allowed.
- Entries containing final price after cashback will not be considered valid
- Product link and price must be correct and it should be in the same post. (Round off figure will not be considered) if price is Rs 4.56 Then mentioning Rs 5 is not valid)
- If the deal is from eBay, seller rating less than 50 will not be allowed (unless it is promoted by eBay itself).
- Deals/Coupons from sites which are banned on DesiDime won’t be allowed in the contest.
- If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty
- Other Terms & Conditions will be notified simultaneously with the products.
- In case of any dispute, admin team will take the final decision.
Never buy if you are a dimer (one chance only).
Rules for match
- Each team will get 30 minutes to find the Most Expensive product.Time starts as soon as the product is posted.
- You are allowed to put only one entry in contest thread, you can decide when to put it in that half hour, the team with the highest price wins….. if the time stamps of the post shows the half hour has crossed even by one mili sec… the entry wont be considered
- Editing your thread or posts is not allowed. If you find a better deal/coupon, please comment in your contest thread as a fresh post.
- Links/Sites where the product is out of stock will not be considered as an valid entry.
- The product has to be from an Indian site (international sites shipping products to India wont be considered).
- Coupons can be applied, but these coupons can not be one time coupon codes of other coupon/affiliate sites, cant be bank specific coupon codes, Signup/registration coupons will be allowed.
- Entries containing final price after cashback will not be considered valid
- Product link and price must be correct and it should be in the same post. (Round off figure will not be considered) if price is Rs 4.56 Then mentioning Rs 5 is not valid)
- If the deal is from eBay, seller rating less than 50 will not be allowed (unless it is promoted by eBay itself).
- Deals/Coupons from sites which are banned on DesiDime won’t be allowed in the contest.
- If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty
- Other Terms & Conditions will be notified simultaneously with the products.
- In case of any dispute, admin team will take the final decision.
ALL THE BEST !!!
@bobby4080 Buddy i am with you
After going through full chat feels really bad for you.I want to know without convincing both the teams how admins can take decision of rematch not at all fare. Now they came at point where they think they are everything but sir @admin @@nigel@@ @bumblefoot never forget what you are at this time is due to the contribution of these dimers😔
@mahidada wrote:
As match was rescheduled all of a sudden, (Between DD5 and DD22)
Both teams affirmation was necessary….. to play the rescheduled match
As Match was to be played because of the mistake of League conductors….
Bobby`s team did not play match, is total failure of DD.
DD should have convinced Bobby`s team to play this match.
League could have been extended by 2 more days…but now, this dark spot will always be there for this years DPL.
and, abhimahajan`s team also cannot be too happy to play alone in controversial match.
PS: Just convincing 2 teams (at this period) was necessary to play rescheduled match to conduct all fair League
Well Said bro
@win_edge wrote: Mistake made by ADMIN.. Penalty to DIMER…. how CRAZYYYYYYY…. DPL [APL]
@Spock @Magus @DealSeeker @rajasekharstrikes @sreev @agent007 @Paisa_de @GoogleCA @billa ajith @Amolverma.6 @B@R_0_0_D @Deal-Kwik @AtulTheDimer @shreyansh94135 @Scorpion @kumar785307 @Beinghuman @munna master @A2Zdeals @mahidada
who are you ! and i do not know what you are talking about :-/
Translation: as a one time special un-suspension offer i got 50% OFF from @bumblefoot on the weekly ‘protection money’ payments. He was so nice to even give me grace period during year ending/ 31st March.
[and since i do not declare or deposit the TDS in government coffers i also save on that deduction before i make the payments to @bumblefoot]
naa bhaaya na ! ya sab mei ..mhaarey koi leejo-deejo naa hai. mhaaney yaa prapanch sei durr raakho !
tranchlotion: i is not is let winning edge make my edge loose ! nahhh
nahh seriously, i do not follow these contests at all , so no idea.
wish it was treated more as a ‘game’ than as a ‘competition’.
if cricket was a ’gentleman’s game and played as such, it used to be funfor all.
here’s wishing everyone that the DPL matter are amicably resolved in a fair and just manner.
i remain..
@win_edge wrote:
@bobby4080 wrote:
@bumblefoot wrote:
guys we are always here to discuss, if not they we will not be having this discussion.
When I am not accepting to play Tiebreaker.. how you people decide the match timing….. you people and other team guys both combined and take one side decision is it fair…
As am single here you guys taken decision without my acceptance…
Mistake made by ADMIN.. Penalty to DIMER…. how CRAZYYYYYYY…. DPL [APL]
@Spock @Magus @DealSeeker @rajasekharstrikes @sreev @agent007 @Paisa_de @GoogleCA @billa ajith @Amolverma.6 @B@R_0_0_D @Deal-Kwik @AtulTheDimer @shreyansh94135 @Scorpion @kumar785307 @Beinghuman @munna master @A2Zdeals @mahidada
@sukhichd710 wrote:
@bobby4080 Buddy i am with you
After going through full chat feels really bad for you.I want to know without convincing both the teams how admins can take decision of rematch not at all fare. Now they came at point where they think they are everything but sir @admin @@nigel@@ @bumblefoot never forget what you are at this time is due to the contribution of these dimers😔
+1
its not DPL bro its APL really ……………………………………
@kumar785307 wrote:
@sukhichd710 wrote:
@bobby4080 Buddy i am with you
After going through full chat feels really bad for you.I want to know without convincing both the teams how admins can take decision of rematch not at all fare. Now they came at point where they think they are everything but sir @admin @@nigel@@ @bumblefoot never forget what you are at this time is due to the contribution of these dimers😔
+1
its not DPL bro its APL really ……………………………………
if Quarterfinal match is resheduled then y should you are not resheduled our no result matches that i was requested earlier …….
this is absolutely APL not DPL…….@Nigel @bumblefoot
@Spock wrote:
@win_edge wrote: Mistake made by ADMIN.. Penalty to DIMER…. how CRAZYYYYYYY…. DPL [APL]
@Spock @Magus @DealSeeker @rajasekharstrikes @sreev @agent007 @Paisa_de @GoogleCA @billa ajith @Amolverma.6 @B@R_0_0_D @Deal-Kwik @AtulTheDimer @shreyansh94135 @Scorpion @kumar785307 @Beinghuman @munna master @A2Zdeals @mahidadawho are you ! and i do not know what you are talking about :-/
http://www.desidime.com/users/...30 (User/Dimer)
I am talking about DPL Match going on in DD… in that admins made mistake…
Mistakes here in the Match…
1.Of my entry they rejected because of its not an indian site and Nigel quoted to prove the site as Indian site {Dimers proved the site is Indian site}
2.Tie braker Round→ It clearly Quoted that nigel didnt done any mistake regarding warranty.. And the winning has declared..
3.They scheduled the semifinal match.
4.They didn’t locked the thread after completion of Quater final, when our opponent guys were raising the issues in the thread,when we are raising the same issue the thread got locked stating that we usually lock the thread after scheduling the next match.
5.Without the acceptance of the both teams regarding rescheduling they rescheduled the match.
6.Admins has done the mistake the impact on only single Dimer (@bobby4080 ) 
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
@win_edge wrote:
@bumblefoot wrote:
@win_edge will you now stop spamming unless you have something useful to say.
What am spamming sir… i am telling the truth…
Almost every match same issue.. by amdins…. why reschedule whole DPL
Can you please list the matches where the admin team took erratic decisions. You are saying its done in almost all the matches.
Is your statement correct. ??? If it is so, kindly list them here.
We as a community should not accuse the admin team if they commit a mistake. Running such a big contest is not a easy task. Managing 40 teams together. Sometimes they may be wrong, but its the duty of the dimers to bring it to their notice.
Many saw that the warranty aspect was removed from the question posted yesterday. But no one came up when abhimahajan was fighting for the mistake done. Its today the admins realized that there was a mistake at their end. And they tried to rectify it.
So please don’t blame and accuse the admins and generalize that this has been done throughout the tournament.
Check this bro… http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
@bobby4080 wrote:
Mistakes here in the Match…
1.Of my entry they rejected because of its not an indian site and Nigel quoted to prove the site as Indian site {Dimers proved the site is Indian site}
2.Tie braker Round→ It clearly Quoted that nigel didnt done any mistake regarding warranty.. And the winning has declared..
3.They scheduled the semifinal match.
4.They didn’t locked the thread after completion of Quater final, when our opponent guys were raising the issues in the thread,when we are raising the same issue the thread got locked stating that we usually lock the thread after scheduling the next match.
5.Without the acceptance of the both teams regarding rescheduling they rescheduled the match.
6.Admins has done the mistake the impact on only single Dimer (@bobby4080 )
Mistakes here in the Match…
1.One Of my entry they rejected because of its not an indian site and Nigel quoted to prove the site as Indian site {Dimers proved the site is Indian site}
2.Tie braker Round→ It clearly Quoted that nigel didnt done any mistake regarding warranty.. And the winning has declared..
3.They scheduled the semifinal match.
4.They didn’t locked the thread after completion of Quater final, when our opponent guys were raising the issues in the thread,when we are raising the same issue the thread got locked stating that we usually lock the thread after scheduling the next match.
5.Without the acceptance of the both teams regarding rescheduling they rescheduled the match.
6.Admins has done the mistake the impact on only single Dimer (@bobby4080 )
@bobby4080 @bumblefoot @admin @Nigel
I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by @bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. This is what I comprehend from what happened yesterday and today:
In the tie-breaker round, @Nigel posted the product first with the requirement “warranty required” and later appended the post such that warranty doesn’t come in the picture. All fine till here.
The entry posted by @bobby4080 was:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
The product is from Shopclues and the price quoted was correct. He forgot to mention the coupon.
According to Rule No 11 (One Chance Only):
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.
The product page does not have any mention of seller warranty. The page further states;
“Please Note: All products at ShopClues.com are brand new, 100% genuine and come with Manufacturer’s warranty wherever”
So even if @Nigel committed a mistake, of removing the warranty details …. @bobby4080 post is not INVALID when it comes to warranty issue. Rule No 11 takes care of the warranty issue.
So if todays rematch was conducted based on warranty issues, that’s wrong. And this is what I asked here:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
If it was related to coupon, decision of a rematch was correct.
So in my opinion, today’s rematch shouldn’t have taken place.
I request all the admins to take a look into this issue and take a logical decision.
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
@bobby4080 @bumblefoot @admin @Nigel
I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by @bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. This is what I comprehend from what happened yesterday and today:
In the tie-breaker round, @Nigel posted the product first with the requirement “warranty required” and later appended the post such that warranty doesn’t come in the picture. All fine till here.
The entry posted by @bobby4080 was:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...The product is from Shopclues and the price quoted was correct. He forgot to mention the coupon.
According to Rule No 11 (One Chance Only):
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.The product page does not have any mention of seller warranty. The page further states;
“Please Note: All products at ShopClues.com are brand new, 100% genuine and come with Manufacturer’s warranty wherever”So even if @Nigel committed a mistake, of removing the warranty details …. @bobby4080 post is not INVALID when it comes to warranty issue. Rule No 11 takes care of the warranty issue.
So if todays rematch was conducted based on warranty issues, that’s wrong. And this is what I asked here:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...If it was related to coupon, decision of a rematch was correct.
So in my opinion, today’s rematch shouldn’t have taken place.
I request all the admins to take a look into this issue and take a logical decision.
Take a correct logical decision and make the derserving winning team enter the semi finals. Bobby post is not invalid even if warranty aspect has to be considered.
@B@R_0_0_D wrote: @Spock is @numberek in the list ?!
[OFF-TOPIC]
exactly ! 
#Acha_Nahi
[/OFF-TOPIC]
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
Take a correct logical decision and make the derserving winning team enter the semi finals. Bobby post is not invalid even if warranty aspect has to be considered.
+1
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
Take a correct logical decision and make the derserving winning team enter the semi finals. Bobby post is not invalid even if warranty aspect has to be considered.
Absolutely well said bro 
@bumblefoot wrote:
So in tie breaker question, we have mentioned warranty part as compulsion but was taken off within few seconds. But team DD5 saw it and was searching products with warranty and team DD22 didnt and they were searching without warranty.
Since there was confusion between both the teams and it was an error from our end too, we are going to have tie breaker match again and that will decide who will be playing in semi finals.
If both teams agrees we can have match at 1 PM today.
@fpdhunter
@bobby4080
@parvezshamsi2000607
@Amit Goyal
@abhimahajan980242
@pjsandyy
You Rescheduled The Match due To Warranty issue what I shared is under Warranty Please look in it
@Magus wrote:
@Spock wrote:
…seriously, i do not follow these contests at all , so no idea.wish it was treated more as a ‘game’ than as a ‘competition’…
Ditto.CC @win_edge
@win_edge @bobby4080 I do not follow these deal contests so I am not aware of what really happened. Consequently, it would not be right of me to comment or take sides. I hope the admins will take the right call about re-conducting the disputed match, if required. CC @bumblefoot
@DealSeeker wrote:
@Magus wrote:
@Spock wrote:
…seriously, i do not follow these contests at all , so no idea.wish it was treated more as a ‘game’ than as a ‘competition’…
Ditto.CC @win_edge
@win_edge @bobby4080 I do not follow these deal contests so I am not aware of what really happened. Consequently, it would not be right of me to comment or take sides. I hope the admins will take the right call about re-conducting the disputed match, if required. CC @bumblefoot
TQ for your support
Lol thread
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
@bobby4080 @bumblefoot @admin @Nigel
I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by @bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. This is what I comprehend from what happened yesterday and today:
In the tie-breaker round, @Nigel posted the product first with the requirement “warranty required” and later appended the post such that warranty doesn’t come in the picture. All fine till here.
The entry posted by @bobby4080 was:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
The product is from Shopclues and the price quoted was correct. He forgot to mention the coupon.
According to Rule No 11 (One Chance Only):
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.
The product page does not have any mention of seller warranty. The page further states;
“Please Note: All products at ShopClues.com are brand new, 100% genuine and come with Manufacturer’s warranty wherever”
So even if @Nigel committed a mistake, of removing the warranty details …. @bobby4080 post is not INVALID when it comes to warranty issue. Rule No 11 takes care of the warranty issue.
So if todays rematch was conducted based on warranty issues, that’s wrong. And this is what I asked here:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
If it was related to coupon, decision of a rematch was correct.
So in my opinion, today’s rematch shouldn’t have taken place.
I request all the admins to take a look into this issue and take a logical decision.
+1 for ( I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by@bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. )
@bobby4080 wrote:
@bumblefoot wrote:
So in tie breaker question, we have mentioned warranty part as compulsion but was taken off within few seconds. But team DD5 saw it and was searching products with warranty and team DD22 didnt and they were searching without warranty.
Since there was confusion between both the teams and it was an error from our end too, we are going to have tie breaker match again and that will decide who will be playing in semi finals.
If both teams agrees we can have match at 1 PM today.
@fpdhunter
@bobby4080
@parvezshamsi2000607
@Amit Goyal
@abhimahajan980242
@pjsandyy
You Rescheduled The Match due To Warranty issue what I shared is under Warranty Please look in it
@bumblefoot wrote:
So in tie breaker question, we have mentioned warranty part as compulsion but was taken off within few seconds. But team DD5 saw it and was searching products with warranty and team DD22 didnt and they were searching without warranty.
Since there was confusion between both the teams and it was an error from our end too, we are going to have tie breaker match again and that will decide who will be playing in semi finals.
h1. If both teams agrees we can have match at 1 PM today.
@fpdhunter
@bobby4080
@parvezshamsi2000607
@Amit Goyal
@abhimahajan980242
@pjsandyy
If the both teams agrees only we can have match team didn’t accepted to play match how the game is scheduled
@Amit Goyal wrote:
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
@bobby4080 @bumblefoot @admin @Nigel
I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by @bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. This is what I comprehend from what happened yesterday and today:
In the tie-breaker round, @Nigel posted the product first with the requirement “warranty required” and later appended the post such that warranty doesn’t come in the picture. All fine till here.
The entry posted by @bobby4080 was:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
The product is from Shopclues and the price quoted was correct. He forgot to mention the coupon.
According to Rule No 11 (One Chance Only):
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.
The product page does not have any mention of seller warranty. The page further states;
“Please Note: All products at ShopClues.com are brand new, 100% genuine and come with Manufacturer’s warranty wherever”
So even if @Nigel committed a mistake, of removing the warranty details …. @bobby4080 post is not INVALID when it comes to warranty issue. Rule No 11 takes care of the warranty issue.
So if todays rematch was conducted based on warranty issues, that’s wrong. And this is what I asked here:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
If it was related to coupon, decision of a rematch was correct.
So in my opinion, today’s rematch shouldn’t have taken place.
I request all the admins to take a look into this issue and take a logical decision.+1 for ( I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by@bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. )
DD5 Member also accepted my deal is correct.. and @TRAVOLTA is showing the proof for warranty which was posted by me….
As per Rule No. 11 (In One chance only)….“If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty”
@bobby4080 wrote:O bro….chill
@Amit Goyal wrote:
@TRAVOLTA wrote:
@bobby4080 @bumblefoot @admin @Nigel
I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by @bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. This is what I comprehend from what happened yesterday and today:
In the tie-breaker round, @Nigel posted the product first with the requirement “warranty required” and later appended the post such that warranty doesn’t come in the picture. All fine till here.
The entry posted by @bobby4080 was:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
The product is from Shopclues and the price quoted was correct. He forgot to mention the coupon.
According to Rule No 11 (One Chance Only):
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.
The product page does not have any mention of seller warranty. The page further states;
“Please Note: All products at ShopClues.com are brand new, 100% genuine and come with Manufacturer’s warranty wherever”
So even if @Nigel committed a mistake, of removing the warranty details …. @bobby4080 post is not INVALID when it comes to warranty issue. Rule No 11 takes care of the warranty issue.
So if todays rematch was conducted based on warranty issues, that’s wrong. And this is what I asked here:
http://www.desidime.com/forums/hot-deals-online...
If it was related to coupon, decision of a rematch was correct.
So in my opinion, today’s rematch shouldn’t have taken place.
I request all the admins to take a look into this issue and take a logical decision.+1 for ( I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by@bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer. )
DD5 Member also accepted my deal is correct.. and @TRAVOLTA is showing the proof for warranty which was posted by me….
As per Rule No. 11 (In One chance only)….“If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty”
I only said that " I truly appreciate the fighting spirit showed by@bobby4080 and respect him as a valuable dimer.
I truly respect you as a dimer and as a player.
Now I am not posting about that thread.
In shopclues Seller warranty product page also those lines are available…then is it consider as valid deal??
Warranty has to be mentioned on product page.
Warranty with year or month should be mention on product page….
Ex Warranty = 1year (without seller or manufacture)then,
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.
(in previous dpl , pepperfry page does not mention about manufacture or seller….so this line included in t&c…)
@Nigel @bumblefoot Am i right??
can u pls clarify my doubt??? it will helpful for future games…. 
Guys Let me clear the rules first.
Point 11
If the product page does not categorically say it is seller warranty it will be considered as manufacturer warranty.
So a product page warranty part needs to mentioned.
We have seen entries where only “warranty” “product warranty” “brand warranty” etc is mentioned, so for those cases rule is mentioned, but shopclues entry there is nothing mentioned about its warranty by seller.
If you guys are talking about note which is mentioned by shopclues then i am sorry we are not going to consider that as warranty by seller who is selling the actual product.
This is what it says
Please Note: All products at ShopClues.com are brand new, 100% genuine and come with Manufacturer’s warranty wherever applicable.
Its wherever applicable. So seller will have to mention if it comes with warranty or not.
So that is not considered as warranty by seller. If this is what you are trying to communicate, then all products in shopclues comes with manufacture warranty & that’s not the case.
Coming to rescheduling of match.
Now Both teams saw the product differently & yes it was our mistake. So in this case yesterday’s tie break was not even valid right. So there was no winner. Since question we shared was incorrect. So i dont see any discussion related to yesterday’s tie breaker issue. Because question was not valid so nobody won.
And that was the reason we had tie breaker round today. And both teams were available here and in their presents match was conducted. Now to participate or not its totally upto teams we cant force anyone for that.
So we are really not able to understand what is the issue here. if there was a rematch scheduled today when both teams were present & had equal chance to qualify.
We are not going to change any decision now.
![Lowest - OnePlus 163 cm (65 inches) Q Series 4K Ultra HD QLED Smart Google TV 65 Q2 Pro (Black) [Apply Coupon + Icici Card]](https://cdn1.desidime.com/topics/photos/1783352/medium/615l0lJ7HEL._SL1500_.jpg?1714604054)
![Sony WF-C500 Truly Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds [Coupon + Amazon Icici Card]](https://cdn3.desidime.com/topics/photos/1783350/medium/51sj_JxisFL._SL1500_.jpg?1714602849)
http://m.indiatoday.in/story/sushil-kumar-narsi...