Kajriwal Resigns ....

ethicalshopper wrote:
Even if we believe that he is scared of janlokpal, you cannot use it in retrospect, so effectively nullify all his previous deals!!!!

Is it your personal comment? If yes, will you plz elucidate what you meant to say!

Can you remember the purpose of Anna Hazare’s movement?

Don’t simply believe whatever Bhagoda says, think well and take decision.

One question to all AAPtards.. Who do you think AA party is going to support after Lok Sabha elections?

Okay I can hear some of you saying he is going to get full majority.. well that is something too much optimistic but what every one knows it is not going to happen. Again he will put referendum and will give support to them saying janta yehi chahte hai

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1…1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitut…tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

dimepincher wrote:

ethicalshopper wrote:
Even if we believe that he is scared of janlokpal, you cannot use it in retrospect, so effectively nullify all his previous deals!!!!

Is it your personal comment? If yes, will you plz elucidate what you meant to say!

Can you remember the purpose of Anna Hazare’s movement?

I copied the post and mentioned that.
I very much remember about Anna’s movement. And to state, I am not completely against AAP as a party. What irritates me more is AK’s dramas and the taards brain-washing of Aam Aadmi. Not all supporters are taards though.

On a different note, AAP releases its first list of candidates.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/aap-challenges-big-g...

Some good/clean folks there. Hope someone there get to takeover the party and stop dramas and do what is needed.

duke wrote:

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1…1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitut…tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

I think Copy Paste Problem

Here Is Both Link

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/19…1/

http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constituti…tm

Problem IS Why He Resign Forget LokpalBill He Would Have Done Lots Of Gr8 Things For Delhi If He Stay In Govt So Why He Quit Only For Lokpal Bill Or Something Else ?

And Lokpal Bill Need If Govt Is Not Running Properly But This Is People Say We Are 100% Pure Than Why So Much Hype For Lokpal In Delhi

See You Are The Power You CAn Do Anything Forget Lokpal Make Delhi Gr8 In 4 YEars You Will Not Need Lokpal Bill But He Quit And Run Away

HE SAid I Quit For Something Good What About Now What Delhi People Will Do ???

How He Will Solve Problem Of Delhi Without Staying In Govt

His Truth Is He Is Big DramaKing He Don’t Know How To Rule When Pressure Comes On Head He Threaten Dharna And Resignation Electricity Reduce Rate 100% Water And OTher Facility Is Not Like You Write Order And It Will Happen You Have To Go Thru Process But He Only Give ORder From Tomo Electricity Will 50% Reduce Water All Will Get

Babaji Ka Thullu Not Even 20% OF Affected People Got Water And Reduce Power Charges Now He Quite So Company Will Start Looting Again

If Election HAppen Again He Will Not Get Seat More Than 5 I Am Not Saying Because I Don’t Like Him But He Is Quitter N Looser And Public Never Vote This People

If Akhilesh Rabdidevi Can Run State Like Bihar Up Why Not Arvind Kejrival Run Delhi And Do Some Good For Ppl

wolf wrote:

duke wrote:

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1…1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitut…tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

I think Copy Paste Problem

Here Is Both Link

http://indiankanoon.org/doc/19…1/

http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constituti…tm

Problem IS Why He Resign Forget LokpalBill He Would Have Done Lots Of Gr8 Things For Delhi If He Stay In Govt So Why He Quit Only For Lokpal Bill Or Something Else ?

And Lokpal Bill Need If Govt Is Not Running Properly But This Is People Say We Are 100% Pure Than Why So Much Hype For Lokpal In Delhi

See You Are The Power You CAn Do Anything Forget Lokpal Make Delhi Gr8 In 4 YEars You Will Not Need Lokpal Bill But He Quit And Run Away

HE SAid I Quit For Something Good What About Now What Delhi People Will Do ???

How He Will Solve Problem Of Delhi Without Staying In Govt

His Truth Is He Is Big DramaKing He Don’t Know How To Rule When Pressure Comes On Head He Threaten Dharna And Resignation Electricity Reduce Rate 100% Water And OTher Facility Is Not Like You Write Order And It Will Happen You Have To Go Thru Process But He Only Give ORder From Tomo Electricity Will 50% Reduce Water All Will Get

Babaji Ka Thullu Not Even 20% OF Affected People Got Water And Reduce Power Charges Now He Quite So Company Will Start Looting Again

If Election HAppen Again He Will Not Get Seat More Than 5 I Am Not Saying Because I Don’t Like Him But He Is Quitter N Looser And Public Never Vote This People

If Akhilesh Rabdidevi Can Run State Like Bihar Up Why Not Arvind Kejrival Run Delhi And Do Some Good For Ppl

Gandhi quit as barrister, shatri quit as Railway min were all bhgoda’s for MURDERERS OF GANDHI wearing RSS underpants. JanLokpal WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL 13 bill including financial bills passed were passed in Delhi Aseembly without/LG/CENTRE approval were CONSTITUIONAL for RSS BIGOTS who constitutionally killed hundreds in AYODHYA shouting "KASAM RAM KEE KAHATE HAI MANDIR YANHEE BANAYENGE..eternally since 1992 every election*.

So, let me show a real BHAGODA to Paid/Bigot BHAKTS.

Narendra Modi run away from studio during interview by Karan Thapar

Narendra Modi wanted to Escape, but sadly this time he was in Plane could not chuck reporter.

Areey Oooo Copy Paste Queen

When Modi Quit Govt ????

I Am Not Talking About Interview In Studio

Yes He Run Away From Media Because Of Godhara Riots Question

In Everyone Has Weakness So When Someone Push Finger On It Everyone Run

Don’t Change The Topic Blind Khujliwal Follower

Areey Oooo HINDUTVA TALIBANI

Answer about constituion in 13 bills that Yedurappa party passed without lg/ centre approval?

Answer constitution followed in AYODHYA RIOTS?

Answer constituion followed in snooping women by ATS?

Don’t Change The Topic Bigot FEKU BHAKT

Hindutva Talbani Is Better Than Cross Breed At-least I Am Proud To Be Hindu And If I Protect My Culture Religion And Respect And Someone Call Me Hindutva Talabani I Don’t Care About That Cross Breed

wolf wrote:

Hindutva Talbani Is Better Than Cross Breed At-least I Am Proud To Be Hindu And If I Protect My Culture Religion And Respect And Someone Call Me Hindutva Talabani I Don’t Care About That Cross Breed

RSS UNDERPANTS are neither hindu nor muslims because for following any religion you have to be HUMAN FIRST!!

This HINDUTVA stuff is same as TALIBAN! So for god sake for your FEKU politics dont disgrace our religion!!

KASAM RAM KEE KHATE HAI MANDIR WANHEE BANAYENGE…Every election since 1992

yes u r pefectly right if it was a normal legislation..
what u said is applicable for all states in a way that after a legialation is passed it is sent to Governor in states( LG in delhi, president in centre ) –
But here we have a FINACE BILL
For this a procedure goes like this( for centre, UT, or state)

Prior sanction of president, governor, LG is required for its introduction..
In 1986 Govt did not take prior president sancetion- result- Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986. President rejected

Above is just to emphasise how a finance bill is difference from normal bill..

Now coming to delhi specifically- Here we have an additional requirement of Centrla Govt accent prior to finance bill being tabled in delhi assembly..

In addition to this on the day Khujliwal resigned – LG’s note was read in assembly which stated that – LOkayukta bill has not followed proper order so it should be allowed to be tabled- NOW with both above points it would have been unconstitutional to table it— But Anarchist as he is along with fervor & unconditional bling love of supporters hw went ahed with it & lost confidence in assembly,..

duke wrote:

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1…1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitut…tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

rajdesidime wrote:

yes u r pefectly right if it was a normal legislation..
what u said is applicable for all states in a way that after a legialation is passed it is sent to Governor in states( LG in delhi, president in centre ) –
But here we have a FINACE BILL
For this a procedure goes like this( for centre, UT, or state)

Prior sanction of president, governor, LG is required for its introduction..
In 1986 Govt did not take prior president sancetion- result- Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986. President rejected

Above is just to emphasise how a finance bill is difference from normal bill..

Now coming to delhi specifically- Here we have an additional requirement of Centrla Govt accent prior to finance bill being tabled in delhi assembly..

In addition to this on the day Khujliwal resigned – LG’s note was read in assembly which stated that – LOkayukta bill has not followed proper order so it should be allowed to be tabled- NOW with both above points it would have been unconstitutional to table it— But Anarchist as he is along with fervor & unconditional bling love of supporters hw went ahed with it & lost confidence in assembly,..

duke wrote:

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1…1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitut…tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

Hahaha RSS underpants talking about Constitution. RIP irony!!

FEKU BHAKT,

Q) JanLokpal WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL but 13 bill including financial bills(VAT ETC) passed in Delhi Aseembly without/LG/CENTRE approval were CONSTITUIONAL?

So for Gandhi Murderers & 1992 AYODHYA RIOTS masterminds: As per law If a bill passed by Delhi Assembly is passed by president, it automatically becomes clear irrespective of being sent to lg/centre like all these 13 bills. & the JANlOKPAL bill had to be sent TO PRESIDENt anyways BECAUSE if the Assembly passes a bill(like JanLokpal) that is repugnant to a central law, then the President’s consent is required to be taken.

But if lokpal had been passed by delhi along with bjPEE delhi’s leaders,feku’s JHOOTA-YUKTA bill of Gujarat’s bill would have been bare in front of everyone. So lets all paid/bigot BHAKTs do what RSS Underpants & their Profesor of Takshila: FEKU are best at: RUMOUR-MONGERING

rajdesidime wrote:

yes u r pefectly right if it was a normal legislation..
what u said is applicable for all states in a way that after a legialation is passed it is sent to Governor in states( LG in delhi, president in centre ) –
But here we have a FINACE BILL
For this a procedure goes like this( for centre, UT, or state)

Prior sanction of president, governor, LG is required for its introduction..
In 1986 Govt did not take prior president sancetion- result- Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986. President rejected

Above is just to emphasise how a finance bill is difference from normal bill..

Now coming to delhi specifically- Here we have an additional requirement of Centrla Govt accent prior to finance bill being tabled in delhi assembly..

In addition to this on the day Khujliwal resigned – LG’s note was read in assembly which stated that – LOkayukta bill has not followed proper order so it should be allowed to be tabled- NOW with both above points it would have been unconstitutional to table it— But Anarchist as he is along with fervor & unconditional bling love of supporters hw went ahed with it & lost confidence in assembly,..

duke wrote:

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc...1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constit...tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

Good Point.

For Aaptards:Rajive Dixit Comment on AK seems coming true that Outsiders want to demolish Indian institutions to take control. He was needed to strengthen institutions not demolish them. This is India not Talibaan. Open eyes before you regret aaptards

who is talking to u imbecile
these things r above ur understanding…
U continue ur faltu bhasan..& lick khujli wali as*

gghai wrote:

rajdesidime wrote:

yes u r pefectly right if it was a normal legislation..
what u said is applicable for all states in a way that after a legialation is passed it is sent to Governor in states( LG in delhi, president in centre ) –
But here we have a FINACE BILL
For this a procedure goes like this( for centre, UT, or state)

Prior sanction of president, governor, LG is required for its introduction..
In 1986 Govt did not take prior president sancetion- result- Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986. President rejected

Above is just to emphasise how a finance bill is difference from normal bill..

Now coming to delhi specifically- Here we have an additional requirement of Centrla Govt accent prior to finance bill being tabled in delhi assembly..

In addition to this on the day Khujliwal resigned – LG’s note was read in assembly which stated that – LOkayukta bill has not followed proper order so it should be allowed to be tabled- NOW with both above points it would have been unconstitutional to table it— But Anarchist as he is along with fervor & unconditional bling love of supporters hw went ahed with it & lost confidence in assembly,..

duke wrote:

wolf wrote:

why Kejri not followed the constitutional provisions …is he an anarchist ???….read and decide yourself

Kejriwal Drama Exposed
—————————————

Fact 1: Congress and BJP, on the floor of the house, officially recorded their support to JLP, if brought in constitutionally.

Fact 2: To table the bill in the assembly, you need the green from the LG AND follow the constitutional law.

Fact 3: LG clearly wrote to the Speaker of the House, which was also later READ OUT to the house that the bill cannot be tabled directly into the house. Govt cannot bulldoze its way overriding the LG’s letter.

Fact 4: Article 254: (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1…1/) of our Constitution, Point 1 clearly mentions that in the case of repugnancy with the Centre’s passing of the bill, you can write to the President or go to the Courts.

Fact 5: Article 239 AA (http://delhiassembly.nic.in/constitut…tm) of the Constitution will enlighten you that the JLP cannot be tabled directly, without writing to the President. This was outlined by the Additional Solicitor General.

Fact 6: If you have a dispute over the above constitutional laws, amend them or challenge them in court. Else, follow the due procedure.

Fact 7: Even following the due process would have only extended the tabling of the bill by 7-10 days.

Stop being an ignoramus. Quitting “over” the JLP is gross misleading the public, thanks to emotional ignoramuses like you, who fell for the emotional appeal Arvind Kejriwal had.

Politically speaking, had AAP decided to go through the constitutional route, waited for 7-10 days and then if Cong/BJP had not supported the passing of the bill, Cong/BJP would have been exposed big time! They didn’t do that. Lastly, I would expect a referendum on exit, if i was expected to reply to a referendum on entry! and oh, did I forget that there was no FIR filed against Ms Dixit? If the man has still convinced the depths of your heart of his honesty and virtues, sure. All the best!

Great that you brought up these points!

You are on the spot with facts 4 and 5.(though none of your quoted links are working.)

But AAP supporters(lawyers to be precise) quote section 26, which says that if a bill is tabled and passed by the assembly an approval from the LG can be sought even after its passage. Even Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee supported the argument.

Anyways, the job of a lawyer is to argue the case in such a manner that his client wins. In this instance, each lawyer is proving the other wrong to get his point across .Let us leave them.

Legislators are elected for the benefit of citizens. The purpose of legislature is to enact laws. Should the legislature enact a law which is contentious then Courts decide it legality.

In this case the complete Govt machinery was used in an illegal manner to prevent an elected Govt to table the legislation.

The Central Govt knew that if this legislation is tabled then there is no option but to vote for it. So its introduction is to be prevented at any cost.

This is ANARCHY.

Hahaha RSS underpants talking about Constitution. RIP irony!!

FEKU BHAKT,

Q) JanLokpal WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL but 13 bill including financial bills(VAT ETC) passed in Delhi Aseembly without/LG/CENTRE approval were CONSTITUIONAL?

So for Gandhi Murderers & 1992 AYODHYA RIOTS masterminds: As per law If a bill passed by Delhi Assembly is passed by president, it automatically becomes clear irrespective of being sent to lg/centre like all these 13 bills. & the JANlOKPAL bill had to be sent TO PRESIDENt anyways BECAUSE if the Assembly passes a bill(like JanLokpal) that is repugnant to a central law, then the President’s consent is required to be taken.

But if lokpal had been passed by delhi along with bjPEE delhi’s leaders,feku’s JHOOTA-YUKTA bill of Gujarat’s bill would have been bare in front of everyone. So lets all paid/bigot BHAKTs do what RSS Underpants & their Profesor of Takshila: FEKU are best at: RUMOUR-MONGERING

hii.satya62 wrote:

10 Feb 2014

Should we trust him… these all things are just to manipulate public… Jan lokpal bill is for fighting corruption, and a corrupt party will never accept it… (congress changed the original Lokpal bill from Anna and brought a useless bill inplace)

Kejriwal resigned because he was a toothless tiger… and for fighting age old corruption and strong corrupt monsters, he was lacking in power and support…

Jagsss wrote:

hii.satya62 wrote:

10 Feb 2014

Should we trust him… these all things are just to manipulate public… Jan lokpal bill is for fighting corruption, and a corrupt party will never accept it… (congress changed the original Lokpal bill from Anna and brought a useless bill inplace)

Kejriwal resigned because he was a toothless tiger… and for fighting age old corruption and strong corrupt monsters, he was lacking in power and support…

Bill by AK is also replica of Center bill!!!

Do aaptards know it???

ethicalshopper wrote:

dimepincher wrote:

ethicalshopper wrote:
Even if we believe that he is scared of janlokpal, you cannot use it in retrospect, so effectively nullify all his previous deals!!!!

Is it your personal comment? If yes, will you plz elucidate what you meant to say!

Can you remember the purpose of Anna Hazare’s movement?

I copied the post and mentioned that.
I very much remember about Anna’s movement. And to state, I am not completely against AAP as a party. What irritates me more is AK’s dramas and the taards brain-washing of Aam Aadmi. Not all supporters are taards though.

On a different note, AAP releases its first list of candidates.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/aap-challenges-big-g...

Some good/clean folks there. Hope someone there get to takeover the party and stop dramas and do what is needed.

1st of all, all laws can be applied retrospectively if 1) the consequences of the events are still present &/or 2) The interpretation of the law demands so. So what you have stated earlier is factually wrong.

2ndly, I know your political stand.

3rdly, The main reason of Anna’s movement was to pass Janlokpal Bill which got diluted by the ruling Central Govt.

Last but not the least, AAP still hasn’t got enough momentum to consider it as a serious contender in the national arena. Though their presence in Delhi has caused much fanfare & received huge soundbites in the media.

1920 – non cooperation movement-khilafat andolan
1930- swaraj movement
1942- bharat chodo
in all movements ganjhijii & INC predeclared aim was freedom( atleast after 1931 all overtly)
but he had to pull back early & compensate with lesser demands everytime—SO did he made a mistake?
Was he to stick to his demands right from 1920’s since his active participation in national movemnt?

Any large dsnt wrk this way- Except if one is fan of brutal movemnts casein spanish & french revolutions.
Its not black & white- there’s always give & take but emphasis remains that movement should surge ahead & every conciliation finds us a step ahead of our last one & gradually step by step we achieve our goal..

Somthing similar Anna did by negotiating— Who said its an end but its a begining towards great journey..Had he not done all that i guarentee even in next 15 years no Lokpal we eould have heard across in India.

What if our Constitution makers sat for deliberations till eternity so as to form a Perfect constitution..??
Its jst not possible – it has to change with changing demands of time ( Just like Lokpal will),
resulting in over 115 amendments & many more to come..

So i c it as a great step…but AAPtards will reject all this staraightway,,

BTW i know ur allegience too for a particular party jst like u know for Ethical…

dimepincher wrote:

ethicalshopper wrote:

dimepincher wrote:

ethicalshopper wrote:
Even if we believe that he is scared of janlokpal, you cannot use it in retrospect, so effectively nullify all his previous deals!!!!

Is it your personal comment? If yes, will you plz elucidate what you meant to say!

Can you remember the purpose of Anna Hazare’s movement?

I copied the post and mentioned that.
I very much remember about Anna’s movement. And to state, I am not completely against AAP as a party. What irritates me more is AK’s dramas and the taards brain-washing of Aam Aadmi. Not all supporters are taards though.

On a different note, AAP releases its first list of candidates.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/aap-challenges-big-g...

Some good/clean folks there. Hope someone there get to takeover the party and stop dramas and do what is needed.

1st of all, all laws can be applied retrospectively if 1) the consequences of the events are still present &/or 2) The interpretation of the law demands so. So what you have stated earlier is factually wrong.

2ndly, I know your political stand.

3rdly, The main reason of Anna’s movement was to pass Janlokpal Bill which got diluted by the ruling Central Govt.

Last but not the least, AAP still hasn’t got enough momentum to consider it as a serious contender in the national arena. Though their presence in Delhi has caused much fanfare & received huge soundbites in the media.

dimepincher wrote: 2ndly, I know your political stand.

ha ha ha…. you concluded on something that i myself dont know yet
i dont even know which party i would support or caste my vote in 2014… in the past i did say i prefer bjp over others based on best of the worst formula (note that I never strongly supported BJP), but as the elections are coming closer, getting to know more about NaMo, be it some fake accomplishments or those photoshops etc. so definitely my weightage to NaMo has gone down.

ethicalshopper wrote:

dimepincher wrote: 2ndly, I know your political stand.

ha ha ha…. you concluded on something that i myself dont know yet
i dont even know which party i would support or caste my vote in 2014… in the past i did say i prefer bjp over others based on best of the worst formula (note that I never strongly supported BJP), but as the elections are coming closer, getting to know more about NaMo, be it some fake accomplishments or those photoshops etc. so definitely my weightage to NaMo has gone down.

oops… I thought that you are sitting on the fence (waiting for the perfect party to support).

But you have understood something different.

Will NaMo or any of his Wise fans answer this ?

VIDEO LINK : https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=471705126....

or is Modi silent because Ambani is financing his helicopters and rallies ?

48 day ! 48 Achievement Of AAP !

1. Polluted water giving in name of free water
2. More Than 178 people died due to cold and shortage of night shelter
3. Increased water traffic charges 10%
4. Increased electricity traffic charges 8 %
5. Support Terrorist ! AAP govt opposes death penalty to Khalistani terrorist Bhullar!
6. Half Electricity for only those who supported Ak , defaulter
7. Cutting water connection who did not voted to AAP
8. Invitation to Naxal, Maoists for joining AAP
9. Stopped retail FDI , Making people jobless , but no action for creating new jobs
10. No Women Security Force
11. No Permanancy of Guest Teachers
12. Racist’ comments made by AAP MLA somnath bharti
13. Somnath bharti abusing to other
14. Somnath bharti trying to influence a prosecution witness in a case
15. Aap leader has been arrested for allegedly raping a woman on the pretext of providing her a job
16. No security provided for women
17. He stopped the janta durbar.
18. No Permanancy of temporary DTC employees
19. No Permanancy of Contract Labour
20. No action against corrupt aap Law Minister
21. AAP MLA Dinesh Mohaniya was slapped by a woman over water supply problem
22. 372 Crore subsidy to Ambani(discoms). AAP Anil Ambani Bhai Bhai
23. Took Govt house, sofa, TV etc
24. Took brand new VIP cars with VIP number
25. More than 70 press conference but no development work
26. AAP leader was forced foreign women to urinate in public
27. No scholarship for students
28. AAP MLA somnath bharti Selling/running PornSite
29. AAP activists caught in an immigration test fraud in UK
30. No improvement in govt school
31. Breaking india unity and Support reservation ! 90% DU seat reserved for delhi people, now imagine if bangalore say 90% jobs reserve for bangalore people
32. Lots of drama n Dharna
33. Transfer 800 delhi jalboard to delhi jalboard
34. Installing faulty water meters
35. Zero Governance & Full anarchy
36. Power Cut started
37. slept on street to protect his own minister
38. Supporter drinks alcohol during dharna
39. Manish Sisodia using NGO Kabir fund for personel use
40. AAP fund fraud: Issued same receipt to multiple donors
41. AAP Members’ Involved in Visa Scam
42. Creating Lots of Problem to common people through dharna
43. AAP Supporter threaten to heart attack patient when they ask the AAP workers not to park vehicles outside my house and it was difficult for my family to take my vehicle out during the emergency
44. Insults women (kerala nurses)
45. Aam Aadmi party insults Christians and Hindus
46. AAP has stopped all the projects which were sanctioned earlier
47. No improvement in colleges
48. Somanth Bharti’s supporters molested foreign women

केजरीवाल ने भागने मेँ मिल्खा सिँग का रिकार्ड तोड़ा…पहले IIT भागा…फिर टाटा की नौकरी से भागा..फिर सरकारी नौकरी से भागा..फिर अन्ना के आंदोलन से भागा..फिर आमरण अनशन से भागा..फिर जनता दरबार से भागा..फिर रेल भवन के धरने से भागा..फिर अपने वादो से भागा..फिर सीएम की कुर्सी से भागा..अब pm बनकर घोटाले करके देश छोड़कर भागने की सोच रहा है..What a bhagoda sir g..भाग कज़री भाग

Why Kejrival Only Attack On Indian Company Why Not Foreign Company Who Looting India From Decade Never Saw Him to Speak Against Other Country Company….Is He Getting Fund From Them Like Ford Giving Them

Why He Asking Modi Will He Thinking To Support Modi In LS Election In 2014 If No Than Who The Hell Is He Asking Ask Pappu And His Mother Why Why Why They Ruled 60 Year And Made Reliance Bigger Not Modi

Ambani ke upar koi statement dena to door.

Ambani ka naam bhi nahi liya jaata Surgeon sahab se!
http://www.tubechop.com/watch/2…53

Sidha sawaal ka jawaab bhi nahi de paa rahey hain ye log .

Why ? just because Ambani ke fenke hue tukre khaate hai ye log.

Modi must break silence on gas pricing: Kejriwal

Arvind Kejriwal questioned the BJP’s silence on the hike in gas price for Reliance Industries Limited from April 1 and challenged the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, to spell out his stand on the issue. He claimed that Mukesh Ambani and the Adani Group have been backing the Gujarat Chief Minister for the past year and said he would write to Mr. Modi in the next two to three days in this regard.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/modi-must...

भक्तों का तो धर्म है अपने नमो भगवन की भक्ति करना . और जो भगवन के खिलाफ बोले उसको लिए अपशब्द इस्तेमाल करना.

खैर जो भी

ये रही जनता की राय

If Modi Hug Mukesh Ambani People Called HIm Partner Of Mukesh Ambani Than What Below Picture will Called ???

kejriwal has always been an escapist..everyone knows that..it wasn’t right in the first place to burden those tender shoulders with such a big burden, he might prove successful as a panch or sarpanch in gram panchayat, but beyond that it would be like appointing a primary school teacher as VC of a big university..

wolf wrote:

If Modi Hug Mukesh Ambani People Called HIm Partner Of Mukesh Ambani Than What Below Picture will Called ???

half truth is always dangerous and makes mind corrupt.