Can you solve this Riddle?

Answer with Explanation

Abhi tak nahi hua solve

2000 rupess loss….

1. Simple anwser imagine i m shopkeeper having a original 2000 rupess note total i have rupees in with me…..
Now when the lady came and took the grocery she game me 2000 (duplicate) note which is fake and
nowbi had two 2000 rupee note.
3.I went to other shop and gave 2000 duplicate note in return he gave 2000 original notes of smaller denomination now i had 4000 rupess in original and i gave in return her 1650 which i had in change now i had 2350 but when i returned the other shop 2000 as he gave me the duplicate note that i had given him yesterday…so total loss 350+1650 = 2000

Insted of Rs2000 you written Rs20000, edit this

C…2350

2000

After getting change of 2000 he kept 350 and gave 1650 to lady but the main thing is the amount 1650 is not from his pocket its from change of 2000 so it means he is still having no loss and got 350 of goods cost.
Now this time he has to return to other shopkeeper 2000 which will be from his pocket and he lost the cost of good as well.
Thus the total amount he lost is 2350 (2000 from his pocket to shopkeeper and 350 cost of good).
I had lots of discussion with lots of people and this is the final conclusion.

2000 Rs. and Trust

2350

F 2000

2350 -——- 2000 rupees + 350 goods which he given to the lady

I am not getting why some people can’t see simple answer 2000

D

1950 loss

Goods+ change + refund to other shopkeeper
350+   1650+  2000=4000

Loss is 2000 only

Lady (profit 2000)
Got 350 worth free grocery
Got 1650 in cash

Shopkeeper from next Shop
no profit no loss

Shopkeeper 1 (loss 2000)
There are multiple ways to compute this lost. But this cannot be greater than or less than total profits from other parties. This is a universal fact so digest this.

Assuming “duplicate” note as fake currency

Total loss —) 350 worth of goods and 1650 cash and he has 2k worth of duplicate note

Explanation

Imagine shopkeeper has 2000 rs with him..
Now this lady comes and take 350 worth goods.. and gave 2000 rs note.. he took change from nearby shopkeeper..
Now shopkeeper has 4000(2000 base + 2000 change)

Now he gives 1650 back to lady..
Now shopkeeper has 2350 left

Now the nearby shopkeeper comes and tells note i fake and takes back 2000

Now shopkeeper has 350 in the end

So, if we calculate he has 2000 and left with 350..
So, cashloss = 1650
And 350 worth goods.. that the lady took with her

When ll u tell correct answer?

F=2700

2000+1650 = 3650

Loss 2000

No loss because Modi will do demonetization 2.0 and cancel all 2000 notes. Sabka lagega.

Answer is 3650₹.

1) Lady purchased some groceries and gave 2000 note to Shopkeeper.

2) Then Main shopkeeper gave that 2000 to next shopkeeper and get 2000 change.

Till here main shopkeeper have 2000 profile.

3) He gave 1650₹ and grocery to lady.

Here shopkeeper have no loss.
(Because he is selling goods with zero profit means he purchased that much grocery in 350 and selling it in 350).

4) Later main shopkeeper gave 2000 to next shopkeeper because of duplicate note.

Here shopkeeper incurred loss of 2000.

So total loss is 2000.

2000

4000
loss is 350 product price , plus 1650 which he gave to lady + 2000 which he has to give to shopkeeper.= 4000

Women(In This Case) :- ISME TERA GHATA, MERA KUCH NAHI JAATA 

Fun to reply at old posts.
I like to think it the simpler way. In this scenario you can be at loss only if someone is gaining.
The other shopkeeper is not gaining anything.
Lady is gaining 350 worth of goods+1650 Rs. So loss is 2000.
People who are getting 4000, don’t count what the shopkeeper had to give. Rs. 1650 which is he giving to the lady isn’t his, it’s of the other shopkeeper. He paid with fake note.

Loss of 2000 rupees.
Grocery lost Rs 350 plus money returned by him Rs 1650. So total Rs 2000 loss

I hope it was not yours